Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Service Client Base Class #300

Merged

Conversation

ryneeverett
Copy link
Collaborator

This seems to be the direction the abstraction is going in and facilitates DRYing up the json response handling.

@ralphbean
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

👍 to the ServiceClient change.

Let's wait to see if we get a response on #299.

@ryneeverett ryneeverett force-pushed the service-client-base branch 2 times, most recently from ecfa8ba to 4a42012 Compare April 13, 2016 22:03
@ryneeverett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rebased and should be ready to go.

@ralphbean I used the json_response method in the taiga service and it doesn't have exactly the same behavior as the validation code you wrote. Is that okay?

This seems to be the direction the abstraction is going in and
facilitates DRYing up the json response handling.
@ralphbean
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

Yeah, that's fine. Thanks @ryneeverett! Good to merge here.

@ryneeverett ryneeverett merged commit bac5108 into GothenburgBitFactory:develop Apr 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants