Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rely on the closed_at field rather than the updated_on one #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 5, 2015

Conversation

pypingou
Copy link
Contributor

@pypingou pypingou commented Oct 5, 2015

For a closed PR, these two should be the same but while we are sure
closed_at won't change, we can't ensure at 100% the same for updated_on
so by relying on closed_at we are safer.

For a closed PR, these two should be the same but while we are sure
`closed_at` won't change, we can't ensure at 100% the same for `updated_on`
so by relying on `closed_at` we are safer.
ralphbean added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2015
Rely on the `closed_at` field rather than the `updated_on` one
@ralphbean ralphbean merged commit 6118163 into ralphbean:develop Oct 5, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants