Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stuff to support task-2.4. #68

Merged
merged 24 commits into from Jan 19, 2015
Merged

Stuff to support task-2.4. #68

merged 24 commits into from Jan 19, 2015

Conversation

ralphbean
Copy link
Owner

We want to stay backwards compatible with task-2.3 too.

@ralphbean
Copy link
Owner Author

The only bug left is related to this issue: https://bug.tasktools.org/browse/TW-1418

@ralphbean
Copy link
Owner Author

A new .beta2 release of taskwarrior-2.4.0 came out, but I hit new issues with it: https://bug.tasktools.org/browse/TW-1434

@coddingtonbear
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, in TW-1418, I made it clear that we could handle the proper escaping in taskw, but I haven't written anything yet :-|.

I think I might just be able to merge the logical_replacements list into the encode_replacements_experimental list in taskw.utils, but I haven't really looked into it enough to tell if that's going to work for both 2.3.x and 2.4.x simultaneously.

@ralphbean
Copy link
Owner Author

The beta3 release came out and it fixes some of our issues, but not all yet. I talked with Paul in IRC briefly about it today and filed this issue for us to track: https://bug.tasktools.org/browse/TW-1463

@ralphbean
Copy link
Owner Author

OK - python2 and python3 tests are passing here for me on task-2.4.0.

@ralphbean
Copy link
Owner Author

taskw is happy now, but bugwarrior is breaking against this: https://bug.tasktools.org/browse/TW-1498

ralphbean added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2015
@ralphbean ralphbean merged commit 934aac0 into develop Jan 19, 2015
@ralphbean ralphbean deleted the feature/task-2.4 branch January 19, 2015 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants